Michi


Reading the last few issues of WIN, I realized more than ever how many of those who contribute articles are currently working as teachers of EFL. I must also presume that the majority of readers fall into the same category. With this in mind, I thought I might write about an interesting facet of Japanese culture which may be of some relevance to those of you who might be puzzled by some of the things you have observed while teaching and working in Japanese schools. I won't delude either you or myself into supposing that this will resolve all mysteries; it might only raise more vexing questions. Still, it is a subject that I think you will enjoy reading about.

I want to make a few observations on the concept of michi and the possible significance of this concept for teachers working in Japan. For the many of you who have a better grasp of michi than I, it is quite obvious that such an enormous topic can only receive the most superficial of treatments in a short article. I'll try to do my best.

Michi “¹, as you probably already know, is the Japan ese word for road or path. In its Sinified reading " do" (less frequently "to"), it can be found in literally hundreds of terms for a wide variety of teachings, philosophies, practices, religions, and so on. In such uses the word is normally translated as "way." Familiar examples include Shinto, the way of the Kami (god), kendo, the way of the sword, kado, the way of flowers, etc. In Chinese "do" is tao (or dao), as in taoism.

Before moving on to a discussion of the relevance of this concept for teachers, I think I should introduce one other important concept which must be borne in mind. It comes to us from the vocabulary of Buddhism and is referred to in English as the principle of expedient means, or "hoben" in Japanese. Briefly put, this principle maintains that there are many paths for a individual to attain spiritual enlightenment. The scriptural source for this idea comes from a sermon contained in the Lotus Sutra (Skt: Saddharmapundarikasutra; Jpn: Hokkekyo) known as the parable of the burning house. As the story goes, there was once a rich man with a great house. Unfortunately, the house caught fire one day with the man's children inside. The rich man called out, urging his children to run for their lives, but the little ones apparently couldn't understand the meaning of words like "fire" and "perish." The man called to them again, this time luring them out with the promise of gifts. Presently, the children came out, and their lives were spared. After telling this story, the Buddha explains that the great house represents the world, engulfed with the destructive flames of passion. The father's deception was necessary to save the lives of his children. In this way, the Buddha accounts for the several paths to salvation. The fact that some of them are not true makes them no less serviceable.

Another important text is a very famous couplet from the Chinese poet Po Chu-i in which he expressed his wish that somehow his "wild words and fancy language" might work as a means toward enlightenment. The implication of this for poets was enormous. It meant that they might accrue religious merit though their steadfast devotion to their art. This went beyond the notion of didacticism-- infusing moral and ethical themes into their literary works for the edification of their readers-- it was concerned more with the relationship between poetic composition and the form of meditative practices observed by Buddhists in their pursuit of salvation. The point to be stressed is that a single-minded devotion to a single art (or disciple) was regarded as an important way to attain spiritual awakening.

This idea received additional validation through further developments in Buddhist doctrine and praxis. One important concept to emerge was the belief that the same essential truth underlay all endeavors. In other words, the attainment of perfection within a particular skill or field of knowledge was a means of comprehending a universal truth. Naturally, it doesn't follow that all instances of intense specialization are pursued in the hope or expectation of awakening. But it does extend considerable significance to the custom of concentrating one's energies within a single discipline.

Translated into practice, this belief seems to have taken the form of a transmission from master to student via a process of imitative rehearsal and unquestioning adherence to the received knowledge. An example can be taken from some of the methods used to train actors for the noh theatre. Not only is it surprising to find that acting is considered a hereditary occupation, and that the traditional way to become a bona fide noh actor is to be born into one of its families, it comes as a small shock to discover that young actors are often drilled in the recitation of lines without any demand that the student understand what they mean. Donald Keene describes part of the training of a Kyogen actor: "The teacher explains neither the meaning of the words nor the mood they are intended to convey, but insists instead on exact, unquestioning conformity to his own delivery." While this practice probably applies only to the earliest phases in an actor's training, it demonstrates the importance of submitting oneself, as a student, to the virtually inflexible precepts introduced by the instructor. Some might argue that the insistence upon slavish emulation has had a damaging effect on creativity. But others counter that it produces different rewards. While recognizing that improvement within a particular michi is incompatible with the development of one's individual creativity, Konishi Jin'ichi writers, "Progress and achievement of a different sort are effected through a denial of one's immediate creativity." In discussions of education in Japan over the last 20 years, a lot has been said about the need for schools to foster the creativity of their students. One wonders how this stated aim can be implemented against so strong a tradition.

Where does this lead us? Well, it helps to explain why Japanese students tend to join only a single club or dedicate themselves to a single sport. More significantly, however, it may account for the seemingly unquestioned acceptance of authority and general conformity that we sometimes witness in our classrooms. The "shyness" of our students and their reluctance to express their opinions or challenge those of others may be a by-product of the michi tradition or, possibly, the deeper principles underlying both.

Anonymous